Ms Berit said. “… The pair are representatives of all
journalists who stand up for this ideal in a world in which democracy and
freedom of the press face increasingly adverse conditions.”
(Nobel image
from youtube.com)
I say, yes, call attention
to government errors or misjudgments via the free press – assuming that the
reporter understands the development project completely first!
(journalism from gamma.app)
And I say it must
be “development of communities” or as I put it, “development of villages” (note
the title of the blog where this article appears: “Communication For
Development Of Vibrant Villages,” blogspot.com).
Watch government: “The nature, objectives and the
expected participation of social leaders and the people.”
Aha! Now I realize that neither PH Pres Ferdinand Marcos Jr nor his Secretary of Agriculture Francis Tiu Laurel Jr has a program
of development of the agriculture sector of my country!
That lack or presence of a development program, consisting
of any number of development projects, should be the first target of any development journalism.
That is
why I am calling for a Nobel Peace Prize
for Development Journalism – the
journalist must first understand the whole of the program
before writing about it.
Sad
to state, but the Nobel Prize journalisms
of Russian winner Mr Muratove and Filipina winner Ms Ressa had centered on the negative,
without first understanding, and stating so, the whole of the
development project that they were criticizing.
Says
our source on “Development
Journalism” (Iresearchnet, communication.iresearchnet.com):
“Development
journalism – a term referring to the role of the press in the process of
socio-economic development...
“Development
journalism was conceived in the 1960s at the Press Foundation of Asia (PFA),
where Filipino journalists Alan Chalkley
and Juan Mercado were concerned
that news organizations were inadequately covering
socio-economic development. Journalists were reporting government press
releases and quotes but giving little attention to detailed analysis,
interpretation, or evaluation of development projects, policies, or problems.”
(my emphasis)
You have the right
to interpret or evaluate a project, policy or problem – only if you know the
nature of development it is meant for.
Not contrarian
journalism, I want Development
Journalism to be independently
included in the consideration of Nobel Peace Prize winners!
“Development
journalism, as conceived by the PFA, implied an adversarial relationship
between independent news media and the government in which reporters offer
critical evaluation and interpretation of development plans and their
implementation.”
Adversarial? To that I say No! There
is intellectual dishonesty in reporting if the journalist does not first
understand the project, where it is coming from (Strategy), what it
wants to achieve (Mission), and where everything is leading to (Vision)!
So! We
need a Nobel Peace Prize for Development Journalism – to encourage governments
to come up with real development projects that people can support!@517
No comments:
Post a Comment